- Victory will save Virginia taxpayers estimated $300 million plus -
EPA had previously issued an edict that would cut the flow of water into the creek by nearly half, in an effort to address the sediment flow on the bottom of the creek. In regulating the flow rate of stormwater into the creek, the agency was trying to regulate water itself as a pollutant, rather than the sediment. The attorney general challenged the EPA's action as exceeding the agency's legal authority to regulate pollutants under the Clean Water Act (CWA). These restrictions also would have diverted public funds that could be spent more effectively on stream restoration for Accotink Creek and other waterways in the region.
READ MORE: http://www.oag.state.va.us/Media%20and%20News%20Releases/News_Releases/Cuccinelli/010313_EPA.html
No comments:
Post a Comment